Why Most SMB Financials Are “Technically Accurate but Operationally Misleading”

Most small business financials don't lie.

But they often don't tell the full story either.

In SMB acquisitions, financial statements are typically prepared to satisfy compliance—tax reporting, annual reviews, bank requirements—not to reflect the operational reality of how the business runs, performs, or transfers. Buyers entering diligence with too much trust in surface-level financials risk misjudging cash flow quality, underestimating transition risks, and overpaying based on distorted performance baselines.

This article breaks down why "technically accurate" financials often mislead operationally—and how disciplined buyers dissect underlying signals to uncover the truth.

Most small businesses (especially sub-$3M SDE) operate on a cash basis. Revenue is recorded when payment is received, expenses when cash leaves the account. This approach—often prepared on a tax basis rather than full GAAP—simplifies tax filing and minimizes current-year tax liability, but it obscures operational reality.

Cash accounting creates distortion:

Revenue timing mismatch: Collections in December might represent work done in October. On paper, strong Q4. Operationally, the cash belongs to Q3.

Deferred expenses: Vendors paid on 60-day terms make margins look temporarily inflated—until the bill hits.

Prepaid expenses: Annual insurance or marketing spends distort monthly P&Ls, creating peaks and valleys that don't reflect operating rhythm.

Example: A landscaping firm collects $300K in March for pre-sold summer contracts. On a cash basis, March looks like peak season. In reality, the work occurs in May–July.

Most SMBs don't maintain job-costing systems, backlog burn schedules, or work-in-progress (WIP) accounting—the tools needed to match revenue precisely to effort.

What disciplined buyers do: Approximate using proxies—WIP schedules, billing cycles, backlog reports, job completion logs. These reveal whether revenue recognition aligns with operational reality—which is what matters for valuation.

Ask: "When was the work performed? When were costs incurred vs. paid? What's your billing vs. fulfillment lag?"

Normalize major prepaids and delayed expenses across periods to avoid over-weighting any one month or quarter.

Accrual conversion isn't about precision—it's about pattern clarity. You need to know if Q4 margins are genuinely stronger, or if they're inflated by deferred Q3 expenses.

Every seller presents "adjusted EBITDA" (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) or "SDE" (Seller's Discretionary Earnings—essentially EBITDA plus owner compensation) by adding back certain expenses. Some are valid. Others distort the true earnings power of the business.

Add-backs are not accounting—they're narrative. They reflect the seller's story about which costs are truly necessary vs. artifacts of their ownership style.

Owner compensation adjustments: Seller pays themselves $200K; market replacement rate is $120K → Add back $80K.

One-time legal or consulting fees: Litigation, M&A advisory, system migration.

Personal expenses: Family phone plans, personal travel, vehicle lease.

Non-cash charges: Depreciation and amortization (standard).

Cyclical expenses disguised as one-time: $25K HVAC repair labeled "extraordinary"—but this type of equipment failure is expected every 18–24 months in asset-heavy businesses. This is maintenance CapEx, not an add-back.

Personal costs with business outcomes: $18K in "personal travel" tied to a trade show that generated major deals. Removing the cost ignores revenue attribution.

Aggressive owner comp adjustments: Seller claims a $100K add-back because "a new hire will work harder for less." If no such candidate exists at $80K, it's fiction.

Friends-and-family discounts: Seller's spouse earns $60K for "admin support." If she handles AR collections, the function still needs to be filled. Market rate may be $40K. Valid add-back is $20K—not $60K.

An add-back must be:

If it fails one criterion, scrutinize it. If it fails two or more, exclude it.

SBA lenders often reject:

Why this matters: SBA lenders underwrite based on sustainable cash flow, not seller optimism. If your financing requires SBA approval, aggressive add-backs won't survive lender scrutiny—meaning you'll overpay relative to what the lender validates.

Asset-heavy businesses: Review 3–5 years of CapEx history to separate maintenance CapEx (recurring) from true one-time events. If "one-time" repairs appear every 18–24 months, they're normalized operating costs.

What disciplined buyers do: Validate add-backs line by line. Request backup: general ledger, bank statements, historical consistency. Stress-test assumptions: Can you really hire a replacement for $X? Was that "one-time" fee really unique?

Add-backs aren't math—they're negotiation points. Price assuming the aggressive ones won't hold, or structure earnouts to capture the delta if seller's optimistic add-backs prove correct.

Sellers often provide annualized P&Ls or TTM (trailing twelve month) statements that obscure intra-year volatility.

Example: A $2M HVAC business shows consistent quarterly revenue. But monthly data reveals:

May-September: $200K-$250K/month (80% of annual revenue)

October-April: $50K-$80K/month (20% of annual revenue)

The business isn't stable—it requires 8 months of working capital to survive the off-season. That's a material operational reality hidden in the TTM summary.

What buyers do: Deconstruct monthly revenue, COGS, and OpEx over 24–36 months. Look for high-variance months without explanation, consistency in gross margin by month, and timing of expense recognition vs. activity. Then adjust cash flow projections and working capital requirements accordingly.

P&Ls don't tell you who the customers are. A $3M revenue business might have 500 customers—or 3. Customer concentration is one of the biggest invisible risks in SMB acquisitions.

Example: Seller claims a "diversified base" of 200+ customers. But the top three drive 72% of revenue:

One is on a month-to-month agreement.

Another is the seller's college roommate.

The third just centralized procurement and is renegotiating pricing.

None of that risk is visible in the financials. It only shows up in customer-level analysis.

Pre-LOI: Request a Top 20 Customer Summary—revenue by customer over trailing 24–36 months, contract type, owner involvement, and payment terms. Some brokers provide this readily; others resist until exclusivity. Push for at least anonymized revenue concentration (top 3, top 5, top 10 as % of revenue) before committing.

Post-LOI: Full customer files—including names, contract terms, and communications history—typically come after LOI signing. This creates risk: you're committing to exclusivity before validating your biggest concentration concerns. Use confirmatory diligence to verify what you estimated pre-LOI.

Test for anchoring risk: Ask: "If we removed the top 2 customers, what does the business look like operationally and financially?" If the answer is "we'd lose 60% of revenue and have no pipeline to replace it," that's not a business—it's a client relationship that won't transfer.

If 50%+ of revenue sits with the top 3 customers, structure contingencies or walk.

Steady EBITDA does not always mean a healthy operation. Many SMBs show stable financials—while quietly running on borrowed time.

Example: A $5M HVAC company reports consistent $1M EBITDA over three years. On diligence:

Three senior techs (50% of revenue) are retiring within 12 months.

No training program or operating playbooks exist.

Dispatch software fails weekly—owner manually reroutes jobs.

Fleet trucks average 180K miles; major repairs are looming.

The numbers are stable. The business is not.

Don't penalize informality—penalize fragility. Most SMBs are informal—that's normal. Handwritten job logs? Fine. One person handling AP? Fine. The red flag is when those informal systems are also fragile: the person handling AP is retiring and no one else knows the process.

Walk the floor without the seller present. Watch how employees handle problems. Who do they ask for decisions? Can they articulate their role without referencing the owner?

Ask these questions:

"What's the CapEx history over the past 3–5 years?" (If zero in an asset-heavy business, deferred maintenance is baked in.)

"What does the succession plan look like?" (If "I haven't thought about it," you're buying owner-dependency risk.)

"Are there SOPs, training documents, system backups?" (If "it's all in my head," post-close operations will collapse.)

Operational fragility paired with no plan for continuity? That's a pricing adjustment or walk-away signal.

Every issue above—concentration, accounting noise, operational fragility—becomes visible only through diligence. Financials are backward-looking. Diligence reveals if that performance is replicable post-close.

AR Aging: Are customers paying within contract terms? If Net 30 invoices are aging to 60+ days, you have collection risk.

AP Spikes: Is the seller delaying payments to boost cash pre-close? Look for spikes in AP in the final months.

Inventory Accuracy: Is stated inventory usable, sellable, and in motion? If 20% is obsolete or unsellable, your asset base is overstated.

Customer Churn: What's the annual churn rate by revenue and logo? High churn behind stable top-line growth means customer replacement pressure—and margin pressure.

Contract Assignability: Are customer agreements assignable without consent? If not, those contracts may not survive the transaction.

Sellers often run lean in the months leading up to exit—pulling cash forward by deferring AP, drawing down inventory, or accelerating collections. This inflates pre-close cash but understates true working capital needs.

Example: Seller reports $150K in working capital at close. But industry standard for this revenue profile is $250K. The buyer will need to inject $100K post-close just to operate normally—an invisible cost not reflected in the purchase price.

SBA Lending Constraints: SBA financing restricts earnouts and extended seller involvement—which limits your ability to de-risk post-close via retention agreements or performance contingencies. This makes working capital validation critical: there's no structural buffer after close if you miscalculate operating needs.

What disciplined buyers do: Build a normalized working capital target based on industry benchmarks (typically 10-20% of revenue for service businesses, 20-30% for product businesses) and historical operating patterns—not month-of-close balance sheet figures.

Not all revenue is equal. Evaluate:

Each element materially shifts what multiple is justified. Recurring revenue with contractual protection commands 1.5-2× higher multiples than equivalent one-time project revenue.

Two companies with $2M in revenue aren't equivalent if:

Company A: 80% recurring SaaS at 90% gross margins

Company B: 80% project-based revenue at 30% margins

Company A commands a multiple 1.5–2× higher—and it deserves it. Revenue quality affects both valuation and operational complexity post-close.

Summary Table: When Financials Mislead

Important Note: Not all validation can occur pre-LOI. Many critical details—contract terms, maintenance logs, customer-level financials—are accessible only after exclusivity. Use summaries, proxies, and pattern recognition to flag risk early, then confirm post-LOI.

Financials that check the compliance box are not the same as financials that support a transfer of ownership.

The seller isn't lying when they present adjusted EBITDA. But they're presenting the business through the lens of someone who's run it for 15 years, knows every customer personally, and can smooth over operational gaps through force of will.

You don't have that context. You don't have those relationships. You won't work 70-hour weeks.

What matters isn't whether the financials are technically accurate. What matters is whether the business can perform at that level under new ownership—without the seller.

That's the gap diligence must close.

Because in SMB acquisitions, accuracy isn't about what's technically true. It's about what's practically transferable.

If you're currently in diligence:

Evermark's weekly brief breaks down the structural, operational, and financial patterns that separate disciplined acquirers from expensive lessons.

Join thousands of searchers, operators, and investors building acquisition discipline.

Join Our LinkedIn Community

Pre-Register for Evermark to access resources, data, and tools designed specifically for acquisition entrepreneurs.